Education & Vaccine Obedience

When it comes to who’s hesitant to take a COVID-19 vaccine, it’s the most highly educated Americans who “probably” or “definitely” aren’t planning on getting it, a new study found.

Researchers at Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh said, ““It finds that the association between hesitancy and education level follows a U-shaped curve with the highest hesitancy among those least and most educated. People [with] a master’s degree had the least hesitancy, and the highest hesitancy was among those holding a Ph.D.”

The researchers’ findings correlate with a 2009 study in BMC Pediatrics that found that parents who refused vaccines for their children “reside in well-educated, higher-income areas than non-refusers.”

The mRNA inventor speaks

 Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology, expressed his concerns about the spike protein used in COVID-19 vaccines to the FDA last fall, but was dismissed

    In its native form in SARS-CoV-2, the spike protein is responsible for the pathologies of the viral infection, and in its wild form it’s known to open the blood-brain barrier, cause cell damage (cytotoxicity) and other problems

    Malone speaks about the bioethics of the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) granted to COVID-19 vaccines; experimentation without proper informed consent violates the Nuremberg Code

    The concept of the noble lie was first described by Plato; it refers to the notion that, in the case of high-status individuals or designated public leaders, it’s acceptable to lie if the lie is made in the interest of the common good

    Three lies are being circulated about COVID-19, including the need for herd immunity, the notion that herd immunity can only be achieved by universal vaccination and that the vaccines are completely safe; any discussion that challenges or goes against these three elements is censored

    Malone believes that children and young adults up to age 30 or 35 should not be vaccinated because the risks outweigh the benefits in this population

Read more from Mercola

Natural Immunity : Previous COVID infections provide long-lasting Immunity

As government agencies push people to get vaccinated even if they’ve already had COVID, evidence is piling up that previously infected persons have a long-lasting immunity — possibly lifelong.

According to an article in the journal Nature, “People who recover from mild COVID-19 have bone-marrow cells that can churn out antibodies for decades.” It’s possible that the viral variants going around right now could “dampen” some of the protection, but the journal still says that people who had SARS-CoV-2 “will probably make antibodies against the virus for most of their lives.”

This is a positive follow-up to hints in early 2021 that the immunity could last at least five months, and possibly longer. At the time in one study by Public Health England, only 44 of 6,614 previously infected persons caught the virus again.

In numbers, this means that previous infection gives 94% protection against reinfection and 83% reduced risk for all infections, Daily Mail reported.

Read more from Mercola

Bayer stops with Glyphosate Herbicides

Beginning in 2023, AG Bayer’s Monsanto unit will stop selling glyphosate-based products in the U.S. and substitute them with “alternative active ingredients.”

The decision follows ongoing litigation regarding the carcinogenicity of Monsanto’s Roundup weed killer. Sustainable Pulse and Detox’s project director Henry Rowlands commented on Bayer’s announcement, saying, “It is a great victory in a small battle for the removal of glyphosate from the lawn and garden market.

“However, this is just part of a much larger war. We must all remember that this will not stop glyphosate being sprayed in parks, schools and on our food crops in ever greater amounts across the U.S. and the world. It is time to phase the chemical out globally and to replace it with safe alternatives.”

Monsanto was engaged in a “deep, coordinated effort to smear, discredit and try to shut down” any information linking Roundup to cancer

Who is hiding the Covid origin?

 In its September 2019 report, the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board — a joint arm of the World Health Organization and the World Bank — warned that technological advances “allow for disease-creating micro-organisms to be engineered or recreated in laboratories,” and that the release of such organisms could cause greater devastation than a natural outbreak

    On the Board are Sir Jeremy Farrar (director of the Wellcome Trust) and Dr. Anthony Fauci (director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIAID), both of whom have defended the zoonotic origin theory for SARS-CoV-2 and helped suppress the lab-leak theory
    February 1, 2020, Farrar set up a confidential conference call with a dozen individuals, including Fauci. Two days later, WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus made a public call for censorship of “misinformation”

    Five days after that call, Peter Daszak circulated the first draft of a scientific consensus statement that eventually got published in The Lancet, and thereafter was used by mainstream media and fact checkers everywhere to “debunk” any and all evidence of a lab leak

    Six weeks after Farrar’s group call, several of the participants published a commentary in Nature Medicine, in which they stated they “do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible”

But according to James Meigs: "The dam is breaking. And with the surging floodwaters, comes a stunning realization: Almost across the board, our elite institutions got the most important question about COVID wrong"

    “The story of why the line of inquiry survived is not an account of leading scientists and health organizations dutifully parsing the evidence.

    Instead, it is largely the story of little-known researchers — many working outside the bounds of elite institutions — who didn’t let the political implications of their findings derail their efforts.

    Much of what we know today about the Wuhan Institute’s risky research is thanks to these independent skeptics who challenged the institutional consensus. Some risked their careers to do so.”

Vaccine deaths, Where are the Autopsies?

A doctor is questioning the lack of autopsies being performed after someone dies after a COVID vaccine because doing so could tell health experts many things about the nature of the disease — not to mention that it would show accountability for those deaths.

Dr. Jane Orient, executive director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, says the toll of post-vaccine deaths has reached nearly 7,000, but she has seen only one autopsy report related to those deaths.

In her experience, Orient said, when a patient without a medical history dies, it requires a call to a medical examiner and that person must decide whether an autopsy is called for. “If an injection had been given, the vial would be recovered, if possible,” she said. “With vaccines, one is supposed to record the lot number, so it would be possible to check a sample for contaminants. If the patient died in hospital, the medical resident was required to request permission for an autopsy.”

She urges people who have unexpectedly lost a loved one to call the medical examiner and demand a forensic autopsy.

Frankenstein Research Uses Aborted Babies’ Parts

In experiments bordering on the freakish labors of the fictional Dr. Frankenstein, researchers at the University of Pittsburgh have been using aborted human babies’ parts to “humanize” mice.

In one study funded in part by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) — of which Dr. Anthony Fauci is director — the experiments involved fusing the human babies’ body parts onto the mice to grow skin and cells. The human baby parts, which included liver, thymus and spleen parts in addition to scalps, reportedly came from either aborted or stillborn fetuses up to 5 months’ gestation.

In the published report, scientists said they received written consent from the mothers to use the babies for the experiments. Photos reproduced by The Sun from the actual study show human hair growing from the backs of the mice after having the aborted human scalps grafted onto them.

The study was published September 3, 2020, in the journal Nature. In it, scientists explain the purpose of the experiment was to study community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA), as well as Lyme disease and dengue fever, in hopes of finding possible vaccines for the diseases.

Aborted human baby parts have been used for years in research. One of the most recent studies was published July 7, 2021, in which researchers at the University of Pittsburgh’s School of Medicine used the parts to look at HIV infections and antiviral therapies for HIV. This study also used human fetal thymus, liver and spleen tissu